Showing posts with label Anticipated Impacts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anticipated Impacts. Show all posts

Monday, May 30, 2016

The Europeans get it:

Europe adapts as climate change becomes reality

Adaptation involves getting infrastructure ready for the changes wrought by climate change. Image credit: Pixabay/ pc dazero
Europe is taking a leading role in efforts to help agriculture, utilities and urban planners adapt to climate change as the floods, droughts and heatwaves that have been predicted for decades start to become a reality.
The last two years were the warmest ever recorded, with 2016 on track to break that record again after April became the seventh consecutive month to be the hottest on record, according to NASA data.
Many of Europe’s river and sea defences are ill-prepared for the surges and heavy rain that will come, while reservoirs aren’t big enough to cope with protracted periods of hot, dry weather.
‘Water disappears from streams and rivers,’ explained Teun Spek, a water policy adviser in the Netherland’s largest province, Gelderland. ‘(There is) a total lack of stream flow.’
‘We are going to be confronted with a world in which the climate is already changing.’
Jos Delbeke, Director General for Climate Action at the European Commission
The science of adapting to climate change is an emerging force in environmental research, and Spek was speaking on 12 May at Adaptation Futures, a conference which has become the focal point of the discipline. 
This year's event was the largest ever adaptation conference, with 1 700 visitors, and was hosted by the Dutch government and the European Commission.
Spek told attendees during a side meeting that drier conditions were often leading to standing water, disease and pests for Dutch farmers.
It’s a story repeated across Europe as the temperature changes that were predicted with increasing certainty during the 1990s as computer modelling improved are now becoming a reality.
Spek was speaking in his capacity as a potential user of BINGO, an EU-funded research project which is trying to tailor climate forecasts so that they are as useful as possible for water utilities.
Dr Rafaela Matos, from the Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil in Lisbon, Portugal, who coordinates BINGO, said: ‘Our focus is on the next 10 years, decadal predictions.'
Supercomputers and satellite systems such as Europe’s Sentinel earth observation network are helping generate ever-more accurate climate predictions. However, as the rains and droughts intensify, the urgent need for projects such as BINGO is to turn the raw data into forecasts that can be used by city planners, utility firms and farmers.
‘We want to increase predictability,’ said Dr Bart van den Hurk, from the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
He coordinates the EU-funded project IMPREX which started at the end of last year. IMPREX is combining different forms of data with high-power climate models to predict how global warming will lead to extreme weather in Europe.
Things to come
The kinds of floods and droughts that have made their mark across Europe, from Bulgaria to Romania, Germany, Poland and the UK, are a sign of things to come.
‘We cannot predict climate on a local scale 10 years ahead or even further, but we can put a lot more effort on extracting the information on what could be happening in that far-away abstract future by looking at the extremes that happen today,’ Dr van den Hurk said.
Following the COP21 climate talks in Paris at the end of last year, policymakers around the world are putting their heads together to work out ways to meet the pledge of keeping global warming to within 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial times. However, according to the UK’s Met Office, global temperatures already broke 1 degree Celsius above the pre-industrial average in 2015, the hottest year on record.
After decades of industrialisation across the world, there is some global warming already built into the climate system, and the science of adaptation means getting infrastructure ready for the changes that will entail.
‘We are going to be confronted with a world in which the climate is already changing,’ said Jos Delbeke, Director General for Climate Action at the European Commission. ‘So adaptation … will require the rethinking of what we are doing not only in Europe but also in the rest of the world.’
This year, the Adaptation Futures conference was held in Rotterdam, the site of Europe’s biggest port.
The Port of Rotterdam could be 10 times more vulnerable to floods by 2100, according to researchers. Image credit: Flickr/ bertknot
The Port of Rotterdam could be 10 times more vulnerable to floods by 2100, according to researchers. Image credit: Flickr/ bertknot

Unlike much of the Netherlands, the Port of Rotterdam was built on relatively high ground outside the areas protected by dykes, in order to allow large tankers to dock there.
It means that as the sea levels rise, there is an elevated flood risk, yet many of the businesses that have established themselves there – which includes oil and chemical firms – were not fully aware of this before they were told about it by an EU-funded project called ENHANCE, which looked at risk management for natural hazards in Europe.
Dr Robin Nicolai from HKV Consultants, a company that researches the risks posed by water, believes that the Port of Rotterdam is vulnerable to a one-in-10 000-year flood at the moment, however that risk could increase to a one-in-1 000-year flood by 2100 under the most extreme climate change scenario due to rising sea levels.
‘That’s a factor of ten in flood probability,’ he said.
As part of ENHANCE, Dr Nicolai and his team worked out that a flood like this could cause up to EUR 2 billion of damage.
They have expanded discussions that were already taking place among the regional authorities so that they could include local businesses and representatives from the national government in the talks.
The idea is that these discussions should help companies work with the national government to develop a plan to prepare for floods, and he believes that discussions like this will become increasingly critical as Europe braces for the impact of climate change.
‘All people that have some kind of responsibility of are influenced by these policies, they should be involved in the process of defining an adaptation strategy,’ he said.

 http://horizon-magazine.eu/article/europe-adapts-climate-change-becomes-reality_en.html
(30 May 2016)

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Coastal Flooding Will Hit World’s Biggest Polluters Hardest






Three of the world’s heaviest polluters will likely face the greatest human and financial costs caused by coastal flooding, one of the effects of climate change.
According to a report released Monday by Christian Aid, an anti-poverty organization, people living in the U.S., China and India — three of the world’s very worst offenders in terms of greenhouse gas emission — face the greatest risks posed by coastal flooding.
By 2060, more than a billion people worldwide will likely confront coastal flooding due to sea level rise, storm surges and extreme weather, with the majority of those people living in major cities throughout Asia.
Calcutta, India, tops the list, where around 1.3 million people are currently exposed to coastal flooding. By 2070, that number is expected to balloon to 14 million, according to the report. Mumbai ranks second, where an estimated 11.4 million people could face disruption due to flooding by 2070. Dhaka, Bangladesh, is third with a projected 11.1 million vulnerable people.
CHRISTIAN AID
The world’s top 20 cities ranked in terms of population exposed to coastal flooding in 2010 and 2070. The rising numbers reflect socioeconomic factors driving populations to the coasts, as well as increased coastal flooding risks due to climate change.
The poorest residents in these areas are likely to be hit hardest, as they would be ill-suited to respond to extreme climate events and would have the most difficult time rebuilding their lives afterward.
“Cruelly, it will be the poor that will suffer the most. Although the financial cost to cities in rich countries will be crippling, wealthier people will at least have options to relocate and receive insurance protection,” Dr Alison Doig, one of the authors of the report, said in a release accompanying the study. “Evidence shows that from New Orleans to Dhaka, it is the poorest who are most vulnerable because they have the worst infrastructure and no social or financial safety nets to help them recover.”
That includes people like Adan Morales Saracay, a 59-year-old fisherman in El Salvador whose family nearly died last year amid a series of wave surges created by a storm at sea.
We were in panic for the love of our families, we didn’t want to lose anyone. So we decided to abandon everything, but it was very scary.Adan Saracay, a Salvadoran fisherman who lost his house in a wave surge.
“It was a Saturday around 2pm. We saw that the waves started getting much larger. Within minutes they came into our houses. By the time the night came, we had to evacuate our entire families. The waves were about 13-14 meters [42 - 46 feet] high,” Saracay recalled to the authors of the report. “We were in panic for the love of our families, we didn’t want to lose anyone. So we decided to abandon everything, but it was very scary.”
“Never in my life have I seen any waves like this before,” he went on. “For the past ten years, the weather has been less predictable. We don’t have anywhere to go.”
After the disaster, Saracay’s house was buried in sand and debris, and the fish he relies on for his livelihood were harder to catch, having fled to deeper water amid the surge.
In addition to the human toll, the report predicts that flooding will exact a large financial cost on coastal cities as well.
In financial terms, Miami is the city that stands to lose the most as oceans rise — not just in the U.S. but in the world. The Florida city is projected to have some $3.5 trillion in assets exposed to coastal flooding by 2070. According to the report, the second most at-risk city in 2070 will be Guangzhou, China, with $3.4 trillion liable; the New York City/Newark, New Jersey area comes in third on the list with a projected $2.1 trillion.
CHRISTIAN AID
The top 20 cities ranked in terms of assets at risk to coastal flooding, both in 2010 and 2070.
To combat these massive human and financial costs, Doig and her co-authors argue strongly in favor of taking action now to lessen pain in the future.
“There is a chance this horrifying vision of the future can be avoided,” Doig, a HuffPost contributor, noted in the release. “It is striking that the cities facing the most severe impacts are in countries with high contributions of carbon emissions. The first thing we can do is speed up the global transition away from dirty fossil fuels to the clean, renewably [sic] energy of the future.”
“We can also do more to prepare for such occurrences,” she added. “Spending money now on reducing the risk of disasters will save money and lives later. Such investment is a no brainer.”
STRINGER . / REUTERS
Flooding at Alton Road and 10th Street is seen in Miami Beach, Florida on November 5, 2013.
Last March, in an address following the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon noted that the cost savings of preparing for catastrophes ahead of time — and perhaps even preventing them — are significant.
“We cannot prevent natural disasters,” he said. “But at least we can prepare ourselves how to minimize disaster risk. We can reduce disaster risk.”
According to Ban, every dollar spent planning for and reducing risk ahead of time reduces the cost spent cleaning up after a disaster by around $7. 
“Resilient recovery means protecting societies against the worst damage from future disasters,” he said. “The money spent is not a cost — it is a valuable investment. Humanitarian needs are rising around the world. Climate change is increasing the risks. Disaster risk reduction is a frontline against climate change.”


Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Threat vs. Risk vs. Vulnerability



Within the climate change adaptation community a significant focus to deal with the impacts has come from the Disaster Risk Reduction community. These communities, largely within donor driver organizations are critical to the response in the event of extreme disasters. They play a critical role in humanitarian efforts. Impacts from climate change will certainly need the support of these organizations.

On the other hand, the approach of disaster risk reduction focuses on mitigation of disasters as extreme events from threats. Threats, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and tsunamis, by definition can not be controlled. This will be important for the extreme effects of climate change when they do occur.

In contracts, climate change adaptation examines increasing vulnerabilities and makes pre-emptive adjustments to treat the negative impacts of those, while improving overall conditions.

Disaster Risk Reduction is reactive.
Climate change adaptation is pro-active.


With all due respect to the disaster risk reduction community and their important work, the approach advocated here is proactive and responsive to the vulnerabilities of human and natural systems resulting from climate change.

Being reactive is being a victim. 
Being proactive is contributing to the solution.




thanks to Pinkerton Consulting & Investigations, Inc. d.b.a. Pinkerton Corporate Risk Management for this clarification at http://www.pinkerton.com/blog/risk-vulnerability-threat-differences

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

And now a word from the climate scientist - We are screwed.

Ice Melt, Sea Level Rise, and Super Storms

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP-cRqCQRc8

I don't always agree with Dr. Hansen on the social, economic and political factors and remedies because they oversimplify the complexity of these variables in actually being able to address and adapt to the situations. But as a climate scientist I respect what he has to say. This is worth the time it takes to listen to it. 

The concepts are fairly well developed and for folks who don't quite grasp all the technical aspects of climate modeling - in short what he is saying is that the models predicting climate change have a longer time horizon than reality seems to have. 

In other words, severe impacts of climate change are happening faster and sooner than anticipated, or we are screwed.

Thursday, March 10, 2016

Let's get serious about impacts

Okay, So I've been reviewing the Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - Summary for Policy Makers.



It's riveting. If you like this sort of thing. Which I actually do.

But here is their summary of anticipated impacts of climate change. This is a summary of their summary. As I read through the full report, I'll have more to say, especially as it relates to adaptation solutions. The impacts - that we need to adapt to break down like this:


  • Decline in freshwater resources: Less freshwater available over all and increase competition among sectors (energy, agriculture, municipal water use, industry, etc.). This has wide ranging impacts we will spend more time with soon. It's a BIG one.
  • Terrestrial (land) and freshwater ecosystem damages: extinction, pollutions, invasive species (think kudzu if you live in the southeast US, or zebra mussels if you live near the Great Lakes). This also will lead to irreversible damage to ecosystems, which leads to decrease in carbon storage, decrease in wood production, decline in water quality, loss of additional biodiversity, and damage to ecosystems.
  • Sea level rise impacting coastal and low lying areas: includes flooding, storm surges, erosion, and submergence. (Not so good for Miami, New York, LA, London, the Netherlands, the Caribbean, etc. - also not great for communities that will be flooded with the people fleeing these areas.) 
  • Marine ecosystems: decline in biodiversity, increase in extinctions, decline in fisheries, including commercial fish catches (Seriously bad news for coastal communities with big fishing dependencies, especially those which have already decimated the estuaries - which most have). 
  • Ocean acidification: loss of coral reefs, disruption of the food web (including plankton), increase damage to polar ecosystems, and serious disruption to commercial fisheries. 
  • Decline in food security and food production systems: we already are seeing a decline in grain yields, and it is forecast to drop very quickly in the next 25 years. This has some bad ramifications as food prices increase, and food becomes more difficult to grow.
  • Food access and prices will become destabilized: as grain production drops and commercial fisheries collapse, (remember grain is fed to livestock as well as humans) access to food sources will become increasingly problematic. People will be hungry.
  • Urban areas become increasingly stressed: by heat waves, extreme precipitation - rains, snow, ice, flooding, land slides, air pollution, drought and lack of clean waters, plus an increase strain on infrastructure, and large populations migrating into urban areas due to economic and environmental dislocation.
  • Rural areas also stressed: by heat, decline in soil fertility and productivity, difficulties accessing clean safe water and food resources.
  • Economic disruptions: while energy needs for heat may decrease over all, energy demand for cooling will increase, and basic infrastructure to support economic activities - such as transportation of people and food - are likely to be deteriorating and threatened - especially by sea level rise and loss of port services.
  • Human health will be jeopardized: due to increase in disease vectors such as mosquitoes (think Zika), loss of nutrients from food and less access to clean safe water, and increase in vulnerable populations who are economically marginalized by climate change impacts.
  • Human security will decline: meaning we will see increased large scale migrations of human populations, which will put stresses on already stressed communities as resources like food and fresh water grow increasingly scarce.
  • Increased violence due to in-group/out-group dynamics: with displaced people migrating and being seen as threatening resource availability.
  • Increased civil unrest: due to increase poverty, increased uncertainty, and economic dislocation with greater expectation of state/government responsiveness.
  • Negative impacts on territorial integrity and infrastructure: as more demand is placed on access to shared resources, repairs to infrastructure and basic state functions will be increasingly stressed.
And all this results in:



Decreased economic growth, increase poverty, decreased food security, increased number of "poverty traps" and "hunger hotspots".

AND there is no mention of the increasing human populations in the timeframe they are looking at!!



In other words, we are in a bad way people. It won't get better and it won't go away. We have to deal with it, and we have to do it - TOGETHER!

A critical concluding remark of the summary states that:

"Underestimating the complexity of adaptation as a social process can create unrealistic expectations about achieving intended adaptation outcomes." p. 29. This will only exacerbate the negative impacts and increase pending civil unrest. 

It's time for us to address the complexity of adaptation as a social process. And get on with it.



For more details please see:
IPCC, 2014: Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.
Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken,P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1-32.





Friday, February 26, 2016

The Curse of Climate Change and the Scientific Method




About a year ago I watched a scientist giving testimony about climate change. She was highly credentialed and well versed in her topic. This lady knew her stuff, that was not a question.

But the Senators questioning her were asking her to give definite answers. They wanted the facts. Only the facts, and they required certainty.

Her detailed responses qualified her findings but did not claim to be absolute fact. 

Her frustration was clear during the questioning, and despite the dire predictions she was making, the politicians seemed to be looking for loopholes. 

The result was those opposed to the ramifications of her findings were able to claim that “there is still a question” and “action would be premature”.

This troubled me, because I could see she was baffled by the Senators inability to grasp how catastrophic the situation is becoming based on her exhaustive research. She was exhausted.

It finally struck me why the scientists and the decision makers are talking across one another, instead of joining together to take urgent action.

Decision makers, Senators, politicians want clear, direct, uncomplicated responses when they ask questions. They cannot tolerate equivocation.

Scientists are trained to consider all the options, and angles, and not ever claim absolutely certainty. At it’s base in scientific reasoning absolute certainty is a sign of hubris and ego, and within the scientific community, it is harshly scoffed. To protect themselves, and to allow for scientific inquiry to thrive, scientists are rigorously trained to avoid over simplification. They can’t give absolute certainty about their findings. 

It’s the curse of the scientific method when trying to make an irrefutable argument. 

The types of answers the politicians need, the scientists cannot give. The type of responses scientists give, the politicians can not use. 

Clearly we don’t have time for this. 

We must teach the scientists and the politicians to speak a common language that can allow us all to move forward to address the very real threats of climate change. 

Doing that is our biggest challenge. Once we accomplish this hurdle, solutions will be far easier.


This was originally posted 17 March 2015 at http://www.ecosocialsolutions.com/MTI/Solutions_Blog/Entries/2015/3/17_The_Curse_of_Climate_Change_and_the_Scientific_Method.html

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Sea Level Rise - even if we slow rising temperatures... GRAPHIC





Back Bay, Boston—Before

Back Bay, Boston—Before

Back Bay, Boston—After

Back Bay, Boston—After

AT&T Park, San Francisco—Before

AT&T Park, San Francisco—Before


AT&T Park, San Francisco—After

AT&T Park, San Francisco—After

(Images: Courtesy Climate Central)

Washington Monument, Washington, D.C.—Before

Washington Monument, Washington, D.C.—Before

Washington Monument, Washington, D.C.—After

Washington Monument, Washington, D.C.—After


And this is IF we seriously slow warming temperatures...

So where are all the people living along these coasts going to go? The infrastructure will be under water, no power, no heat, water and sewage systems backed up, lots of mosquitoes. Likely residents will not be staying there. 

see more at: